AmazonŠFrom Earth¹s Biggest Bookstore To The Biggest Store on Earth?

This is the same Robin Lewis, author of THE NEW RULES OF RETAIL, who is the keynote speaker and moderator of our retail panel at our meeting in May. Register now for 1 of only 200 seats. One supply chain leading company’s CEO is bringing himself and 6 of his senior staff.......enroll on http://www.aapnetwork.net/about/2012-Annual-Meeting.cfm


Amazon…From Earth’s Biggest Bookstore To The Biggest Store on Earth?
by Robin Lewis
Just like the original “Pacman” of the earliest video games, chomping through all of the pac-dots to victory, Amazon appears to be rapidly chomping its way to becoming the biggest store on earth by taking on every product and service category within its reach.
While Amazon’s first slogan “Earth’s Biggest Bookstore” did describe the business they were in, it did not describe the vision of the business they are becoming. That vision, as defined by Amazon’s founder and CEO, Jeff Bezos, had no boundaries, and apparently still does not. Books were always just the beginning in Bezos’s mind.
Furthermore, one might say that it is Amazon, not the Internet, that is changing the face of retailing today by changing the way consumers shop and buy. If the Internet is a fundamental globally disruptive, game-changing event, then Amazon is its most disruptive pioneer.
The company has singlehandedly changed consumer behavior: “running an errand” replaced by “going online;” instantaneous price-shopping from one location; actually bringing retail closer to a perfectly competitive marketplace. Amazon also paved the way to meteoric e-commerce growth for all other retailers by making consumers comfortable with it. Conversely, Amazon has already put Borders and other retailers out of business. Who’s next? Or who will be forced to completely change its model in order to survive?
Indeed, the Internet by itself is just a tool, albeit one for which its uses are still being discovered, with Amazon leading in such discovery. Bezos has stressed the point that Amazon must provide enormous added value to change consumers’ shopping behavior. In fact, early on he called the Internet “a primitive infant technology.” By now, of course, Amazon has taken that technology light years beyond its infancy, but, would concede there are light years remaining for its growth.
So, how big is Mr. Bezos’s vision of the “biggest store on earth?” Who knows? And I would suggest that even he does not have a volume number in mind. Currently, Walmart holds the “biggest” position, at almost $450 billion, against Amazon’s $34 billion in 2010. However, one must note that “Pacman” has grown a blistering 300% since 2006, (vs. Walmart’s growth during the same period of 21%), and is expected to hit about $50 billion in sales in 2011. And, while Walmart has 200 million visitors a week, Amazon is now hosting over 300 million per month, based on comScore estimates, and saw its traffic rise by 15% on Black Friday weekend. Amazon now has an over 20% share of total worldwide e-commerce traffic. Also, more than half of Walmart’s revenues come from groceries and other nondiscretionary items, categories that Amazon has not even attempted to break into.
And, as far as Bezos is concerned, it is still “Day 1” at Amazon, as quoted in his 2010 Annual Report letter, which contained, as do all his Annual Letters to shareholders, a reprint of his original 2007 “Day 1” declaration.
So, how long does it take a $50 billion business, growing at a 300% pace every five years, to reach $400 billion in sales? You do the math. Answer: it’s about 8 years.
Furthermore, Amazon is growing beyond just being the biggest store on earth to being the biggest marketplace on earth where anybody and everybody can set up shop.

“Get Big Fast” and “Omnipotent – ize” the Consumer
As pointed out in Robert Spector’s book Amazon.com: Get Big Fast, Bezos, from Day 1, focused on two things: 1) getting “big fast;” and on 2) making Amazon the “most consumer-centric company on the planet.”
Founded in 1994, Amazon went public in 1997, and by 1999 its stock had rocketed up 5600% without making a penny in profits. When asked at an annual shareholders meeting when they would be profitable, Bezos’s response was deafening in driving home his crystal clear, long term vision and how he planned to fund it. First of all, he did acknowledge to all shareholders and investors that he understood the imperative that long term a business must trade on a reasonable (price/earnings) multiple, and that market cap must reflect the current and present value of future cash flows.
Having given that nod to the traditional investing mindset, he then very clearly stated his strategic vision: that Amazon was focusing on investing in all of the “insurmountable opportunities” provided by the Internet, where e-commerce sales were growing at 2300% a year.
Essentially, from a fiercely competitive perspective, he was saying that he intended to rapidly scale the business in the wild new Internet frontier, where survival of the fittest was a harsh reality.
In short, “get big fast” was his mantra (also an imperative to accomplish his vision). And, Amazon would not turn its first profit until the third quarter of 2001, however meager at $350K, or 3% of net sales.
His long term vision continues to this day, extending out even longer. Quarterly earnings are not the drivers of his vision. Investing in “getting big fast,” is. Share gains now mean profits later. His belief is that first movers can get big fast if they focus more on gaining share of a totally new market than worrying about revenues.
Now, 10 years since turning its first profit, and some 18 short years into the wild west of the Internet, Amazon continues to make money, albeit not much: a five year operating margin of only 4% vs. an average of 6% for department and discount stores. So, it’s apparent that Bezos believes there is still an enormous number of “insurmountable opportunities” in e-commerce, as Amazon keeps investing in acquiring, expanding and innovating itself to ever-greater volume and share. And, those investments pay off in another way. With no physical stores and faster inventory turns, Amazon’s five-year average return on invested capital is 17% vs. traditional retailers’ average of 6.5%. This gives Amazon a market value of $100 billion, which is about equal to that of Best Buy, Staples, Target, Sears, JC Penney, Macy’s Nordstrom and Kohl’s combined.
And, if there is any doubt about share dominance, check out the accompanying chart and Amazon’s whopping number one share of e-commerce sales at 35%. The “runner-up,” Staples at 10%, is not even close. Also notice that Walmart and Sears are the only traditional, broadline retailers that even made the cut, so to speak.
By the way, another strategy often used by Amazon, particularly for new products like the Kindle or Fire e-readers, is to set an opening price below cost, in effect, losing money to grab dominant share of market “fast,” knowing they will make it up on book sales. They will also use hot selling items as “loss leaders” for the same objective: remember the pricing “share wars” against Walmart and Best Buy over flat screen TVs.

How to Define Big and Fast
So, how does one define “big” and “fast?” Well, both are relative. Many would say that at an estimated $50 billion in 2011 sales and having grown at the rate of 300% over five years, Amazon is certainly big and has grown really fast, at least for a retail business. However, relative to Walmart, Amazon is not yet that big. On the other hand, compared to Walmart’s early days following its launch in the 1960s, Amazon’s scale speed is mind-warping.
To put it in a more understandable context, think about the fundamental new retail model facilitated by the Internet, (kind of like from horse and buggy to automobiles). For roughly 50 years Walmart has grown primarily by opening new stores and/or selling more goods out of existing stores. Both require huge investments in money, human capital, and time. Conversely, Amazon’s stores already existed, housed in the millions of personal computers around the world – located not across the street but adjacent to each consumer’s keypad, literally at their fingertips. Thus, Amazon reaches a vast global audience, instantaneously, from one central location, with most of its costs fixed (except for order fulfillment and customer service).
Think about it. Just as Henry Ford introduced assembly line production of automobiles and got “big fast” to own the number one share of that new frontier, Bezos is doing the same in the new Internet frontier. But, rather than manufacturing more cars faster, or opening one or more physical stores as fast as Walmart may be able to, Bezos can literally put anything and everything known to mankind into the Amazon marketplace instantaneously, and for incredibly low costs. And then, of course, Amazon delivers whatever is ordered, often the very next day. Thus, it gets even bigger, faster.
Bezos’s vision has no end, because the Amazon model is limitless.
The Omnipotent Consumer
Bezos’s other mantra: making Amazon the “most consumer-centric company on the planet” is the absolute driver of every new technology, system, process, and web innovation that Amazon creates under their “SOA” (Service-oriented architecture), which they initiated early on, and which has now become the buzzphrase around the Internet.
In last year’s annual report Bezos writes: “Many of the problems we face have no textbook solutions, and so we – happily – invent new approaches. Our technologies are almost exclusively implemented as services: bits of logic that encapsulate the data they operate on and provide hardened interfaces as the only way to access their functionality. This approach reduces side effects and allows services to evolve at their own pace without impacting the other components of the overall system.”
At the end of the letter he says: “As always, I attach a copy of our original 1997 letter. Our approach remains the same, and it’s still Day 1.” And, his first two commitments read: “We will continue to focus relentlessly on our customers,” and, “We will continue to make investment decisions in light of long-term market leadership considerations rather than short-term profitability considerations or short-term Wall Street reactions.”
Bezos has also said: “When people ask me if our customers are loyal, I say, ‘absolutely, right up to the second that somebody else offers them a better service.’” Bezos repeats: “that we were going to obsess over our customers and not our competitors.”
And, following is a sentence out of Amazon’s general description of their business: “We seek to be Earth’s most customer-centric company for three primary customer sets: consumers, sellers, and enterprises.” Here again, this statement embodies Bezos vision beyond just Amazon as a store to a mega-marketplace, as he includes “sellers and enterprises” as customers he aims to please.
And, of course, all three customer sets can be pleased by Amazon’s superior execution of convenience, price and service, comprising the most significant competitive advantages for Amazon. While the convenience of Internet shopping works for all competitors, Amazon has not only aggregated the broadest selection of merchandise ever on one site (truly a one-stop shop), it is also quickly and easily navigable (no more than three clicks to find anything). Further, they invented “1-Click” checkout and an online system that permits customers to exchange unwanted gifts before they even receive them.
While all Internet players have pricing advantage over traditional retailers, (also enhanced, so far, by not having to collect state sales taxes where they have no physical presence), Amazon has further advantage, again, by the ability to leverage their scale and sheer breadth of products to win share by losing margin, potentially to be offset by higher margins in other categories.
Bezos also had a philosophy about competitive pricing that was indicative of his visionary way of thinking. In the Spector book, when asked if he worried about online shoppers having ready access to information that lets them compare prices among all retailers, he answers: “….it’s a concern in one sense, but it’s a concern in the way that gravity is a concern for Boeing.” He goes on to explain this will be the way of e-commerce. “Customers are going to have near-perfect information. The merchants who don’t understand this, and don’t build their business plans on that basis are, I think, going to have the most problems.” And, are they ever.
Service in retailing has many components, and while e-commerce cannot provide the human “touch” of sales associates in a physical store (although it’s hard to find), they can make up for it in other ways. And, Amazon is always raising the bar. Not only the convenience, 1-Click checkout and return/exchange processes mentioned above, but, Amazon knows who you are, what you like, when you bought something with suggestions for new selections and generally their site is customized for you.
And, if you have any issues/problems, the site makes it quick and easy for resolving them.And, by the way, if a consumer cannot find what they want from Amazon.com or any of the other sellers, brands, and/or retailers on the site, Amazon’s “All-Products Search” search engine will locate it elsewhere on the Web, and the consumer might often be led to a competitor’s site. Of this, Bezos said also in the Spector book: “In the categories where we are selling things directly, if we can’t be competitive, then we shouldn’t be standing in the way of our customers” – consumer-centric, indeed.
And, just as quickly and easily as you can navigate, select and purchase anything you want, wherever you are, Amazon can deliver it, free of shipping charges, over night through their Amazon Prime program. This capability is largely made possible by Amazon placing their roughly 15,000 U.S. distribution centers in close proximity to UPS shipping facilities. By the way, Amazon Prime is another example of Amazon forcing the entire industry to change.
I must say, however, that while the on-site shopping and buying process is convenient, quick and easy, the visual presentation of the brand and its marketplace is very utilitarian, and frankly very stale when compared to most other e-commerce sites. If Amazon has some research that found consumers identifying the look and presentation as compatible with their image of Amazon as a low price commodity provider, so be it. On the other hand, as they expand their marketplace, including more upscale brands, they would be well-advised to re-image and modernize the style and look of the site.

Tomorrow the World
Amazon Acquires UPS, Controls the Entire Publishing Industry, Launches Thousands of Neighborhood Showroom Stores
Does this sound a lot like vertical integration? It sure does. And, I believe Amazon through Bezos’s vision is going to pursue such strategies in several areas. If you think about “preemptive distribution,” as defined in our book The New Rules of Retail, Amazon can “retail” the entire world. It is a key tap away, 24/7, in front of millions of consumers’ faces, first, faster and more often than its physical competitors, and can deliver over night through their proximity to UPS. Well, why not acquire UPS (market cap of $69 billion)? Think not? Think again.
Actually, Amazon is also redefining “competition.” If Amazon is a marketplace, (or “mall,” using the vernacular), no one is a competitor. Or, maybe everyone is a competitor. Amazon will allow anybody, including competitors, to sell in their marketplace. Furthermore, the Amazon brand image integrity does not confine it to serving just one consumer segment. It’s a truly democratic model, conceivably offering everything from discount to luxury sector goods without tarnishing its image. Amazon founded the MyHabit upscale designer flash sale site, which competes with Gilt Groupe, Rue La La and others. By the way, as Gilt Groupe approaches $1 billion in sales and gains international coverage, don’t be surprised if Amazon acquires them. Having tested consumer desire for flash sales through MyHabit.com, why not own the market leader, just as it tested Amazon customer appetite for shoes before acquiring Zappos?
And, regarding the second of the three “new rules” in our book: value chain control; what about Amazon’s recent launch of its hard copy and electronic book publishing business? Headed by a publishing industry veteran, Laurence Kirshbaum, it is already wooing best-selling authors. As it grows that business, Amazon has the potential to disrupt and change the entire publishing value chain, beyond just the retailing link it has already altered. One of Amazon’s top executives was quoted in the WSJ: “The only really necessary people in the publishing process now are the writer and reader.” Whoa! Are we talking the “way of the buggy whip” here, for traditional publishing houses, agents, printers, etc.? Well, this is all about value chain control and dominance as well as gaining greater preemptive distribution capabilities, as outlined in the book.
What other industries might Amazon disintermediate, vertically integrate and control? Use your imagination and while doing so, keep in mind that Bezos’s vision and the Amazon business model have no limits.
Finally, and the third of our “new rules,” as a pure e-commerce model, Amazon has so far not been able to provide consumers a neurologically connecting, real-world, physical experience. And, while they have succeeded in creating a great experience online around service, convenience, and price, the “touchy-feely” all senses environmental experiences provided in physical stores, like Abercrombie & Fitch, or Apple, for example, simply have not been possible online.
Well, I believe that is about to change. And, I believe that Walmart and many other brick and mortar retailers will soon feel that “Pac Man chomping” sound on their backside. One reason: with some 15,000-plus distribution centers in the U.S. (10,000 internationally), and with the state sales tax break soon to disappear, how can one not see a simple and logical extension of those centers into small neighborhood showrooms, stocked with samples of local consumer preferences, (since Amazon’s data base is said to be larger than that of the Pentagon with knowledge of what brand of jeans a working mom in Molina, Illinois wears)? And, there might be screens for further shopping and ordering, all in an experiential environment: coffee, music, and so forth? In fact, if you cannot imagine this, a former top executive of Walmart has confided that this is one of Walmart’s biggest fears.
On top of the threat of Amazon competing in the behemoth’s own “back yard” so to speak, with brick and mortar stores, Bezos’s Day 1 vision means Amazon will certainly continue to add products and services at a blistering pace and into infinity, because the business model has no limits.
Are you beginning to get the concept of no speed limits and no size barriers for Amazon? Indeed, their logo with the curved arrow under the letters of Amazon, starting under the ‘A’ and ending under the ‘Z’, was specifically designed to indicate everything from A to Z. Interestingly, it looks like a smile.
Amazon, as the biggest river in the world, now has its name attached to an Internet phenomenon on its meteoric rise to becoming the biggest marketplace on earth.
Welcome to “Day 1.”

Posted by Mike Todaro 

New investment in DENIM right here in this country !!

Timing is excellent on this announcement, it dovetails nicely w/ our annual meeting where the industry will learn for the first time about ALL of the investment being made in this hemisphere. This specific announcement is about our members Plains Cotton Co-op, and its denim mill which was American Cotton Growers until it was merged with the Guatemalan jeans maker Denimatrix into its new name American Denimatrix.

In fact, we ran into our Board member Jack Mathews of American Denimatrix in his booth at ColombiaTex in Medellin earlier this week. His booth was busy every time we swung by but we did have some quality time w/ Jack to get updated on the accounts he is working with, the new investments and the broad range of finishes to their jeans that are ramping up volumes for the US market.

So this is great news from an organization incredibly committed both strategically and financially to this market, just at the time the ‘market’ is ‘coming back;’ for sourcing. As an aside, we love the ‘denim flag’ Jack used as the backdrop to his booth. Wish we had one !!

PCCA Announces Denim Mill Modernization Project

LUBBOCK, TEXAS – (January 24, 2012) – Plains Cotton Cooperative Association (PCCA) today announced the beginning of a modernization project at its American Cotton Growers (ACG) denim mill at Littlefield, Texas.  New state-of-the art spinning frames are being installed that will greatly increase production speed and flexibility.   ACG is one of the largest denim manufacturers in the United States, with capacity to produce 36 million linear yards annually.   Phase One of the project will begin in early April with the arrival of the first of three Schlafhorst Autocoro 8 rotor spinning frames that contain 480 rotors each, according to PCCA Vice President of Textile Manufacturing Bryan Gregory.

“These new spinning frames will replace half of ACG’s current rotor spinning capacity with much higher manufacturing efficiencies,” said Gregory.   The project is scheduled for completion in early June 2012.  The new Autocoro 8 revolutionizes automatic rotor spinning technology and is the biggest innovation in rotor spinning in the last 30 years, according to Schlafhorst.  The technology is based on an innovative machine concept that allows each spinning position to be autonomous and individually automated.

“We will be able to manufacture up to five different yarn counts simultaneously on each new spinning frame due to their single-drive technology,” Gregory added.  “We can change these continuously with full production in progress, and this will allow us to better meet our customers’ needs as they respond to changes in the denim apparel market.  This is because with this new equipment, start-up takes minutes, not hours, to reach full production.”

PCCA is a farmer-owned cotton marketing cooperative headquartered in Lubbock, Texas.  Its ACG denim mill and Denimatrix facility in Guatemala City, Guatemala, comprise the only fully vertically integrated supply chain for denim apparel in the Western Hemisphere.  ACG was one of five finalists for the Texas Employer of the Year Award in 2011, and Denimatrix was one of three recipients of the 2010 Award for Corporate Excellence presented by the U.S. State Department.

For More Information,
Contact John Johnson
806-763-8011, ext. 285
john.johnson@pcca.com

(download)

Posted by Mike Todaro 

Authentic RED TAILS military jackets made by AAPN member CockpitUSA

The attached photos are of Colonel Richard “Rip” S. Harder, a Tuskegee Airman. I worked for Col. Harder at Hamilton AFB, Ca 1969-70. These WWII pilots are profiled in the new movie RED TAILS. I saw this terrific movie yesterday. JUST in case you are eager to dress the part, you can buy absolutely 100% authentic military apparel, especially the functional leather flight jackets, from AAPN members Jeff and Jacky Clyman of CockpitUSA. Yes, that is Jeff on the home page - http://www.cockpitusa.com/

(download)

Posted by Mike Todaro 

4 key business questions - from IBM

I thought this article about my beloved IBM, who mails me a retirement check monthly, would resonate w/ many of you. When I went to IBM’s 100th anniversary celebration here in Atlanta recently, with literally thousands of others, I was reminded how unbelievably lucky I was to have a 10 year active duty former Marine Corp officer willing to take chance on hiring an 11 year active duty former Air Force officer - me.

Bill Murray was IBM/GSD Branch Manager in Detroit and he hired me on the spot, 5 weeks after I’d mailed my resume to IBM HQ’s in Armonk, NY. How in God’s name my letter wound its way thru such a giant company to the In Basket of this man I will never know.

Training back then was a year long – 5 weeks, 5 weeks, 6 weeks and 2 weeks in Atlanta. Being a Marine, Bill ordered me not to come back to the branch from training unless I was first in my class and president of my class – otherwise I would be a stain on his record and an embarrassment to the entire city of Detroit !! He was very easy to understand when he talked to you like this – because his nose was almost touching mine when he said it.

My first class was 39 All Stars, including 2 Navy fighter pilots. The women were beautiful and the men were strong!! The classes were tough. It was all so new to me. I took it very seriously, studying almost midnight every night and not partying – honest. Five people flunked out early and were sent home. In the end, I came back to Detroit first in my class but not president.

The second 5 week class was only 5 weeks after the first and was brutal, extremely technical, including writing software that would actually compile (write me if you do not understand what I just wrote). We worked 19 straight 16 hour days including Easter Sunday. I was not first in my class but was elected president. Upon returning, Bill told me I was obviously untrainable and could not follow orders, so he took me out of training and put me on quota telling me Ford was my customer, that they hated IBM, sold off 4% of our install base there every year, were down in the single digits of an IBM presence there and I would likely not get a commission check for two years. He was right TO THE DAY.

The rest is history. On that note, I hope you each can put the four questions below to work for you and your company..........

Even a Giant Can Learn to Run
The New York Times: December 31, 2011

BECAUSE it has become so consistently successful, I.B.M. is almost boring. This is a company so predictable that its financial forecast is packaged as a “five-year road map,” as if it were some sort of state planning exercise.

Yet behind I.B.M.’s relentless progress over the last decade is a game plan that has been anything but conservative. The company shed multibillion-dollar businesses. It chose higher profit margins over corporate size, and expanded aggressively overseas, seeking sales, low-cost engineering talent and quicker organizational reflexes.

Investors, however, haven’t been bored. The company’s stock price has surged. In November, Warren E. Buffett, who typically shuns technology stocks, announced he had accumulated $10 billion of I.B.M. shares, a stake of more than 5 percent.

All of that didn’t just happen. A large portion of the credit goes to Samuel J. Palmisano, who steps down on Sunday after nearly a decade as chief executive. During his tenure, I.B.M. has been a textbook case of how to drive change in a big company — when so much of the study of business innovation focuses on start-ups and entrepreneurs.

This column is a glimpse of the thinking behind some of the major steps I.B.M. has taken under Mr. Palmisano’s leadership, based on two recent interviews with him.

He says his guiding framework boils down to four questions:
• “Why would someone spend their money with you — so what is unique about you?”
• “Why would somebody work for you?”
• “Why would society allow you to operate in their defined geography — their country?”
• “And why would somebody invest their money with you?”

Mr. Palmisano formulated those questions in the months after he became C.E.O. in March 2002 His predecessor, Louis V. Gerstner Jr., recruited to I.B.M. in 1993, had already pulled the company out of a financial tailspin, first reducing the size of the work force and cutting costs, and then leading a remarkable recovery.

In meetings after he took over, Mr. Palmisano told colleagues that I.B.M. was still good, but that it wasn’t the standard-setting corporation that it had been when he joined in 1973. (A history major at Johns Hopkins and a star offensive lineman on the football team, he turned down a tryout with the Oakland Raiders of the N.F.L. for a sales job at the company.)

The four questions, he explains, were a way to focus thinking and prod the company beyond its comfort zone and to make I.B.M. pre-eminent again. He presented the four-question framework to the company’s top 300 managers at a meeting in early 2003 in Boca Raton, Fla.

“This needs to be our mission and goal, to make I.B.M. a great company,” he said, according to executives who attended the gathering.

THE pursuit of excellence in those four dimensions shaped the strategy. To focus on doing unique work, with its higher profits, meant getting out of low-margin businesses that were fading. I.B.M.’s long-range technology assessment in 2002 concluded that the personal computer business would no longer present much opportunity for innovation, at least not in the corporate market.

The hub of innovation would shift to services and software, often delivered over the Internet from data centers, connecting to all kinds of devices, including PCs. Today, that is called cloud computing; when I.B.M. started promoting the concept several years ago the company called it on-demand computing.

So Mr. Palmisano led a lengthy strategic review of the PC business, deciding to sell while it was still profitable. Internal arguments against a sell-off were intense: PCs pulled in sales of other I.B.M. products in corporate accounts, the cost of electronic parts for its larger computers would jump without the purchasing power of its big PC division, and the corporate brand and its reputation would suffer without PCs, the one I.B.M. product touched by millions of people.

Lately, Hewlett-Packard has engaged in a similar debate, first declaring that it was looking to sell its PC business, then backing off. “I’ve heard every one of the arguments, every one of them,” Mr. Palmisano says. “But if you decide you’re going to move to a different space, where there’s innovation and therefore you can do unique things and get some premium for that, the PC business wasn’t going to be it.”

In 2004, I.B.M. sold its PC business to Lenovo of China. Mr. Palmisano says he deflected overtures from Dell and private equity firms, preferring the sale to a company in China for strategic reasons: the Chinese government wants its corporations to expand globally, and by aiding that national goal, I.B.M. enhanced its stature in the lucrative Chinese market, where the government still steers business.

In total, the PC, disk drive and other hardware businesses that Mr. Palmisano sold off generated nearly $20 billion a year in sales, if not a lot of profits.

The divestitures meant that I.B.M. was no longer the world’s largest information technology company. Hewlett-Packard took that title and took a different strategic path as well, doubling its bet on PCs by acquiring Compaq in 2001. “You see the choice that was made, and how the economics worked out,” Mr. Palmisano observes.

Today, I.B.M.’s stock market value, at $217 billion, is more than four times that of the struggling H.P.

I.B.M. invested heavily elsewhere, buying the business consulting firm PricewaterhouseCoopers Consulting, for $3.5 billion in 2002, for its expertise in specific industries. For I.B.M., the emphasis was to move up from selling customers computers and software to helping them use technology to solve business challenges in marketing, procurement and manufacturing.

Corporations and governments are drowning in a flood of data from internal systems and the Web, struggling to make sense of it. To get ahead of that challenge, I.B.M. has spent more than $14 billion since 2005 buying 25 software companies that specialize in data mining and analytics, looking for useful patterns in data in fields as varied as disease treatment, traffic management and crime detection. And it has increased its research and development budget by 20 percent under Mr. Palmisano, to about $6 billion a year.

Combining research, specialized skills and sophisticated technology is the recipe behind I.B.M.’s Smarter Planet initiative, begun in 2008. It now has more than 2,000 projects worldwide, applying computer intelligence to create more efficient systems for utility grids, traffic management, food distribution, water conservation and health care.

The idea, Mr. Palmisano explains, is to “go to a space where you’re uniquely positioned and use the value of I.B.M.’s integration.”

For him, the Smarter Planet effort is a return to I.B.M.’s roots. Shortly before he became chief executive, he dipped into corporate archives, reading speeches and memos from the founder, Thomas Watson Sr. When Mr. Palmisano was an executive assistant to John F. Akers, then the chairman, in 1989 and 1990, he had lunch with Thomas J. Watson Jr., a former chairman, once a month. The Watsons, he says, always defined I.B.M. as a company that did more than sell computers; they believed that it had an important role to play in solving societal challenges.

“It’s old-fashioned, but it’s motivational,” he says.

And it resonates with the young people I.B.M. is recruiting these days, he says. A couple of times a year, Mr. Palmisano speaks to groups of elite students whom I.B.M. is trying to woo to its research labs. The pitch, he says, is that I.B.M. is a place where you can make a difference and do deep science.

“You can change the world, and you can compete for a Nobel prize,” he says, referring to I.B.M.’s five Nobel winners.

(Eighty-seven percent of the candidates who were offered jobs by I.B.M. Research this year joined the company.)

Mr. Palmisano’s appeal to young technologists is just one example of an answer to one of his four questions. All four, he says, must be addressed. That challenge is now passed to Virginia M. Rometty, who this week becomes the ninth chief executive in the company’s 100-year history.

“The hardest thing is answering those four questions,” Mr. Palmisano says. “You’ve got to answer all four and work at answering all four to really execute with excellence.”

Posted by Mike Todaro 

Wealth

As my Sri Lankan friend recently told me, “if you are born to poor parents, it is fate, but if you marry a poor woman, you’re an idiot”.

Posted by Mike Todaro 

Congratulations to AAPN member Jeanna Peifer

Our congratulations to AAPN member Jeanna Peifer, Vice President Customer Experience for G&K Services who has accepted a position on the Board of Directors of the North-American Association of Uniform Manufacturers & Distributors (NAUMD).

Jeanna has been a long time proponent, along w/ fellow joint member Joe Greco of Greco Apparel, for more interaction between AAPN and NAUMD. In fact, last May, I did have the chance to speak at their annual meeting.

We truly value our friendship with NAUMD President & CEO Richard J. Lerman. This is terrific news and we work in a better industry because of Jeanna’s leadership.

Mike
network of suppliers and suppliers of change since 1981
THE MIAMI MEETING  May 6-8, 2012
OFFICE: 404.843.3171
http://www.aapnetwork.net
http://todaro.posterous.com

 

Image

Posted by Mike Todaro 

Apparel Industry - full of REALLY smart people

On the early morning drive to work today, NPR did a piece on the evolution of the sunflower for commercial applications. Who knew? The role this flower, which originated in our hemisphere, plays today worldwide is so far beyond your imagination as to be unreal – and much of this comes from research Russians focused on it!!

By the same token, while in Managua last year, I chanced to have dinner w/ another man at ProNicaragua’s amazing investment forum. He was a potato guy. I sat there for several hours with my head spinning at the facts and figures he threw at me. For all I know, he was a billionaire.

I’ve had the same reaction reading books about or seeing shows about corn, bananas, cotton, wheat, sugar and so much more.

That brings me to you.

Remembering some of the achievements of Jerry Miller at United Knitting or Giles Beal at Beal Manufacturing; reading about Bryan Ashby’s new alliance with Blue Sign; talking for 45 minutes yesterday with Tom Travis; enjoying lunch yesterday w/ Walter Wilhelm and two execs from Lectra; reflecting on my recent meeting w/ Coats; and on and on and on – it occurs to me that EACH of you know more than you appreciate or acknowledge.

We take for granted that what we do is what we do, no big deal, business as usual. But really, in our industry, if you are working and reading this right now, you know it is business as unusual. We need to acknowledge two false assumptions that have hurt those we have lost in our industry.

They assumed that what they did was not that interesting. And they assumed others knew what they did. They were wrong on both counts and we’re going to prove it in May by getting so many heads spinning we may freeze to death.

This is not a promotion of our meeting in May. This meeting is essentially sold out at 200 people tops now.

But it is a promotion of the fact that you, each of you, are proven geniuses. You just need someone sitting across from you, meeting you, getting to know you, absorbing your experience and acknowledging your value to prove it. You need listeners and we’re doing everything we know how to give you places to do that.

Who will you meet and have the chance to learn from? These people: chemicals, cotton, synthetics, yarn, knits, wovens, trim, thread, labels, zippers, piping, elastic, pocketing, rivets, hangers, logistics, shipping, distribution, legal, customs, testing, embroidery, screen printing, patches, finance, equipment, parts, supplies, technology, consulting, factories, packaging, brands, retailers, design, product development, private label, merchandising, marketing, systems, accounting, replenishment, cycle time reduction, compliance/CSR, sustainability, sourcing, supply chain, purchasing, inventory control, risk assessment, trade shows, associations, lobbies, magazines, universities, government, countries and more.

Each person in each niche is a yard wide and a mile deep. That’s the first part – the depth of your skills. Here at AAPN, we’re your second part – the breadth of your network.

So, I am for sure buying a bottle on sunflower oil on MY way home this evening.

Mike
network of suppliers and suppliers of change since 1981
THE MIAMI MEETING  May 6-8, 2012
OFFICE: 404.843.3171
http://www.aapnetwork.net
http://todaro.posterous.com


Image

Posted by Mike Todaro 

FUD Marketing

There is a great line in the recent NYTimes article about financial planning called Footsteps to Follow in the Coming Year which follows: “Personal finance is more personal than it is finance. ... Strip away the numbers and the returns and the 50-page financial plans, and what you’re left with is people and all of their associated baggage. It is their raw emotions — fear, greed, guilt — that drive most financial decisions for better or (frequently) for worse.”

Don’t you love it when someone strips things down to their fundamentals without using the dreaded “at the end of the d..” line?

Fear, greed and guilt.

In marketing, there are 3 similar truths that those of us who have ‘carried a bag’ (meaning, been on a sales quota) know and that is that the best marketing tools in the bag are fear, uncertainty and doubt (FUD).

While working for IBM, where my division called on not-Fortune-500 companies many of whom never dreamed of buying a computer, we ran into massive objections. The time tested counter to them was the feel, fell, found technique as in, “I know how you feel, Widget Manufacturing felt the same way but what they found when they installed their new IBM S/32 was a less then 6 month payback, primarily in control of spare parts”.

When all else failed, there was always the FUD fallback as in, “well, listen up Ace because this is important – no-one ever got fired for buying from IBM, nowhudahmsayen?”

FUD Marketing, Fear, Uncertainty and Doubt. You feel it every time some major customer is sitting across from you screaming YOU’RE TOO EXPENSIVE. They know the FUD technique too.

The counter to this may really be the feel, felt, found technique as in, “I know how you feel, my (profitable customer of the past 7 years) felt the same way but by sticking with us though thick and thin, raw material price increases, insane legislation, unforeseen global risks, what they have found is long term they are consistently more profitable than those who chase the low cost whatever”.

Well, that’s my thought for the year.......and by God I hope it is the best year each and every one of you has ever had!!!!!

Posted by Mike Todaro 

AAPN twitter becoming sourcing channel

PLEASE create and use your own twitter.com account. My personal one is miketodaro. The AAPN one is aapn AAPNetwork.

This is the most amazing and easy to use diary-like method of communicating that I use here. We harvest so many inputs ranging from Tom Peters and Richard Branson to Harvard Business Review and The Economist. It is the first thing I check in the morning and about every half hour afterwards.

Create your own name, then ‘follow’ us online. AND we will follow you and/or your company for news like that we get from those you see listed on our twitter page.

Here are my two posts within the past 10 minutes:

miketodaro
Just got a wonderful surprise, lunch w/ Walter Wilhelm who is passing thru Atlanta. Love talking to our industry's wisest sage....

miketodaro
Brand writes needing US factory. We broadcast. W/I 20 min, member talking to customer. We built this net in 1994 and nothing since is faster

Posted by Mike Todaro 

Liz Claiborne to Change Name

Gee whiz........wow. So it goes..........


JANUARY 4, 2012, WSJ
Liz Claiborne to Change Name

Liz Claiborne Inc. will change its name to Fifth & Pacific Cos. as it moves past its iconic brand and focuses on Juicy Couture, kate spade and Lucky Brand.

The company agreed in October to sell its namesake, Monet and Kensie fashion brands for $328 million, allowing the cash-strapped apparel maker to reduce its debt. The Liz Claiborne and Monet brands are being sold to department store operator J.C. Penney Co., while the Kensie brand is going to affiliates of the financial-services and brand-management company Bluestar Alliance. Liz also sold its Dana Buchman brand to Kohl's Corp.

The company, founded by Liz Claiborne in 1976, expects the name change and new stock symbol, "FNP," to become effective on or about May 15.

"While it's difficult to replace an iconic name like Liz Claiborne, we believe that Fifth & Pacific Companies telegraphs who we are today—taking inspiration from New York and California, while describing our reach and our potential," said Chief Executive William L. McComb.

The company reported in November its third-quarter loss widened as revenue dropped 9.1%.

Moody's Investors Service last month raised its credit rating on the apparel maker one notch to B2, leaving it five steps below investment grade, citing the sale of its Liz and Monet brands to J.C. Penney.

Posted by Mike Todaro